An elaboration of the previous post mentioning the bounded gaps between primes problem as an illustration of the opportunity cost of converting a fruitful problem such as this solely into a competitive benchmark. [Indeed, as I point out below, this already came close to happening back in 2013.]

As with most other problems worth studying in pure mathematics, the particular bound one gets on these gaps is not of much intrinsic importance. Improving Zhang's bound of 70 million, to 246, 188, or 6 would not, in itself, have significant impact on any other mathematical problem, let alone any real-world application, except for a small number of other analytic number theory problems in which a related numerical bound would also similarly improve. Even the twin prime conjecture, which asserts that the bound can be chosen to be 2, would only unlock a small number of immediate applications if the result is taken as a "black box", although the significantly more general and quantitative prime tuples conjecture of Hardy and Littlewood would be more useful in this regard. But again: the value of this problem lies not in the numerical bound _per se_, but rather in what the quest to study this problem and improve the bound reveals.

Let me first quickly review some key moments in the timeline on this problem. The Quanta articles https://www.quantamagazine.org/mathematicians-team-up-on-twin-primes-conjecture-20131119/ and https://www.quantamagazine.org/a-new-generation-of-mathematicians-pushes-prime-number-barriers-20231026/ in 2013 and 2023 respectively also do a good job of covering these events. (1/8)

External Attachment: https://www.quantamagazine.org/mathematicians-team-up-on-twin-primes-conjecture-20131119/

I must say that crush is totally worth it.

Oooooook..... Dato che nessuno ha scritto un Agent loop per il mio editor preferito, e' arrivato il momento di vedere se riesco a combinare qualcosa.